CHARLOTTE, N.C. — A day after replay officials used camera angles to decide whether a game-changing interception was even eligible for replay, the NFL assured fans Monday that the decisive angle definitely exists, is extremely clear and lives in New York, so you wouldn't know it.
The angle settled whether Denver's red challenge flag hit the field before Carolina snapped the ball on the following play. It did not appear on the television broadcast or on the stadium video board. According to the league, it showed that the flag came first, which cleared the way for a review that turned an end-zone incompletion into a Broncos interception and, eventually, a 26-21 Denver win.
"It's a gorgeous angle. Really conclusive. You'd love it," said Martin Delacorte, the league's newly appointed senior vice president of reviewing whether things can be reviewed. "It's in New York. You don't know it." Asked whether reporters could see the angle, Delacorte said it was shy.
The sequence began late in the third quarter, with Carolina leading 14-13 and the ball at the Denver 1-yard line. A pass to the back corner of the end zone glanced off a Panthers tight end's forearm and floated just above the turf, where a reserve Broncos safety caught it. Officials ruled it incomplete. Carolina lined up for second down. A red flag sailed onto the field. The Panthers snapped the ball anyway, handed it off and gained nothing.
That play, the league later clarified, did not happen. Because the challenge flag was ruled to have come first, Carolina's second-down run was wiped from the record: stuffed for no gain, then deleted, a combination one Panthers fan described as thorough. Delacorte said the league's statisticians have listed it as "No Play (Philosophically)."
The NFL rulebook does not expressly say that replay may be used to decide whether replay may be used. It also does not expressly say that it may not, which Delacorte called "the same thing, legally." Instead, the league leans on Rule 15, Section 9, which lets its officiating department weigh in on the correct application of the rules in situations "including, but not limited to" the ones it lists.
"Those are the four most powerful words in American sports," said Dr. Priya Lindqvist, director of the Center for Clear and Obvious Studies. "Everything else in the rulebook is a list of examples. 'Including, but not limited to' is the rule. Technically, it also covers your homeowners association."
🔁 Request A Review (Of The Review)
Throw the flag to start a review. Before any review can begin, a higher review has to confirm that it was allowed to begin. The league's system has no bottom, and neither does this one.
The review layers in this simulator are invented. Rule 15, Section 9 and its "including, but not limited to" are real, and so was Sunday's ruling.
Delacorte moved quickly Monday to formalize the process, unveiling an Office of Replay Replay to determine whether reviews were eligible for review. Its rulings will be checked by a Replay Replay Review Board, whose own eligibility will be determined by replay. "At some point you have to trust the process," Delacorte said. "Ideally, that point comes before anyone asks to see it."
Fans at the stadium described a disorienting afternoon. "I watched a play, and then I was told the play I watched had been unwatched," said Terri Pickens, 51, a season-ticket holder from Gastonia. "They showed the catch on the big board from every angle. The one angle that decided whether they were allowed to show it, they never showed at all. They showed the T-shirt cannon."
Carolina's head coach said afterward that officials had told him the flag came before the snap and that he had to take the league's word for it. Theologians praised the remark as the purest expression of faith in professional football since the Hail Mary.
Delacorte's office has since updated the league's replay standard from "clear and obvious" to "clear and obvious to us," and circulated a memo defining the word "before." Under the new definition, a flag thrown before the snap includes, but is not limited to, a flag thrown during it.
The challenge itself began with a Broncos staffer who spotted the catch on a replay and shouted into his head coach's headset to challenge it. He received a game ball. Career counselors reported a surge of interest from Americans who have spent decades shouting the same two words at their televisions and suddenly see a path to the pros. "I've been doing that job for free since 1998," said Brent Ostrowski, 46, of Aurora, Colo. "My wife calls it 'the yelling.' The NFL calls it game management."
For readers who would like to judge the timing for themselves, the HuckFinn Graphics Desk has assembled every camera angle available to the public.
🎥 The Angle Room
Pick a camera, then scrub to the moment the flag left the coach's hand. The league's ruling updates live.
Viewers to date: the people who matter
The broadcast angle. It is showing a graphic about the next graphic.
The public angles here are illustrations. On Sunday, neither the broadcast nor the stadium feed showed the replay of the flag's timing; the league says its angles showed the flag came first.
Delacorte said the league is drafting a proposal for next season that would let coaches challenge whether a challenge was timely by throwing a second, darker red flag. A challenge of that challenge would require a third flag, in oxblood. He expects the debate to be settled by replay.
After the interception, the Broncos took over at their own 20, scored touchdowns on their next two possessions and held on for their fifth straight win. Carolina, which has now lost three in a row, is expected to review the tape. Whether it may review the tape is under review.
At press time, Delacorte confirmed that Monday's announcement had itself been reviewed, upheld and sent to New York, where it is doing great. You'd really like it.
Reader Comments (3,117)