BOREAL MOUNTAIN, CALIF. — In what industry analysts are calling "the most honest description of late capitalism's relationship with nature since someone first put a price tag on air," Tucker Norred, marketing director for Boreal Mountain Resort, announced this week that his team has deployed approximately "500 gallons of snow" to create what he repeatedly and without apparent irony referred to as "the product."
"We've probably used 500 gallons of snow to put the product we have up on the hill," Norred told reporters, seemingly unaware that his sentence structure was indistinguishable from testimony one might hear in federal narcotics proceedings. "We blew as much as we could to open safely for guests."
Experts in both linguistics and controlled substance distribution noted the parallel immediately. "The syntax is identical," observed Dr. Helena Markowitz, professor of Applied Euphemism Studies at UC Davis. "Substitute 'snow' for 'cocaine' and 'hill' for 'street,' and you have a statement that would not be out of place in a DEA surveillance transcript. Both industries are, after all, selling a white powder while battling supply chain issues and blaming external conditions for quality problems."
The resort's confidence in its half-thousand gallons appears to rest on what mathematicians are calling "vibes-based meteorology." For context, 500 gallons is approximately the volume of a single residential hot tub—a quantity that, when distributed across Boreal's 41 trails and multiple terrain features, represents what one physicist described as "bringing a water pistol to a drought fight, if the drought were the size of the Northern Hemisphere."
What Boreal is actually combating is a regional snow deficit of historic proportions. The Tahoe Basin has received less than 20% of its average snowfall this season, representing a shortfall of millions of gallons across thousands of acres. The resort's 500-gallon deployment, converted to snowpack, would cover approximately one parking space to a depth of several inches.
"I want to be very clear about what's happening here," said Dr. Raymond Chen, hydrologist at the Desert Research Institute. "They are fighting a continental atmospheric phenomenon—one that spans from the Gulf of Alaska to the Mexican border—with the contents of a single jacuzzi. And they're calling it 'product.' I need to lie down."
The commodification of weather implicit in Norred's phrasing did not escape cultural critics. "When a marketing director refers to a naturally occurring atmospheric phenomenon as 'product,' we have completed a journey that started when someone first charged admission to see a waterfall," observed Dr. Miriam Castillo-Johns, professor of Environmental Semiotics at Stanford. "Snow is no longer a gift from the sky. It's a deliverable. Winter is no longer a season. It's a SKU."
❦ ❦ ❦
Perhaps more remarkable than the resort's confidence was the testimony of Jackson Price, a guest who has visited Boreal Mountain every winter for seven consecutive years. Price's statement to reporters suggested a relationship with geological reality that experts are calling "concerning."
"To be honest with you, the last seven years I've been here, I've never seen this dirt. I've never seen these rocks," Price said, gesturing at the mountain's exposed substrate with what witnesses described as "genuine shock, as if the ground had just betrayed him personally."
The confession prompted immediate response from the scientific community. "Mountains are made of rocks," confirmed Dr. Patricia Hernandez-Webb, chair of the UC Berkeley Department of Geology, in what she described as "the most basic statement I've ever had to make to a journalist." "This has been the case for approximately 4.5 billion years. Mr. Price's surprise is... unprecedented in my experience."
Price's seven-year blindness to the fundamental composition of landforms raises what researchers are calling "disturbing questions about surface-level engagement with the physical world."
"What did he think was under the snow?" asked Dr. Hernandez-Webb. "More snow? A void? The abstract concept of winter made physical? We genuinely don't know, and frankly, we're afraid to ask further questions."
Further complicating matters, Price referred to the mountain's terrain as a "pasture"—a term that technically describes flat grazing land for livestock, not an alpine slope. "It's been straight snow through the pasture," Price reportedly said, prompting geographers to question whether Price understands any landforms at all.
"A pasture is not a mountain," explained Dr. Chen, slowly, as if to a child. "These are different things. One is flat. One is elevated. I'm starting to think we need to check whether Mr. Price knows what any terrain words mean."
The implications of Price's experience extend beyond one man's geographical confusion. Sociologists suggest he may represent a broader generational shift in which nature is experienced as content rather than context—as amenity rather than environment.
"Jackson Price is all of us," reflected Dr. Castillo-Johns. "How many surfaces do we interact with daily without any understanding of their substrate? Modern life may be entirely topping—no foundation. He's simply the first person to say it out loud."
❦ ❦ ❦
While the resort battles its "waiting game with temperatures"—Norred's phrase for what climate scientists call "the permanent restructuring of Earth's atmospheric systems"—the machinery behind its artificial winter reveals a darker irony.
Snowmaking machines, the article's source material notes, are "energy-intensive, often powered by polluting fuels such as gas or coal." This creates what thermodynamic experts are calling a "perpetual irony machine": equipment that burns fossil fuels to create artificial winter, thereby contributing to the warming that eliminates natural winter, thereby necessitating more artificial snowmaking, thereby accelerating warming, ad infinitum.
"It's the most perfect business model capitalism has ever produced," observed economic analyst Franklin Doyle. "You create the problem that generates demand for your solution, and your solution worsens the problem, guaranteeing infinite demand. Normally this would be illegal. Here it's just skiing."
The ski industry collectively produces an estimated 27 million tons of CO2 annually when accounting for snowmaking, lift operations, and guest transportation. While individual resort contributions are small, the aggregate effect is measurable—and self-perpetuating.
"Each artificial snowflake contains a tiny amount of trapped heat debt," explained Dr. Chen. "Guests are essentially skiing on solidified future warming. It's poetic in a way. Horrifying, but poetic."
❦ ❦ ❦
When asked about the long-term outlook, Norred returned to his central metaphor: "It's just been a waiting game with temperatures."
The framing drew immediate analysis from game theorists. "If this is a game, it's one with interesting properties," noted Dr. Sandra Kim of MIT's Game Theory Lab. "Boreal's opponent is temperature—a thermodynamic phenomenon with a 4.5-billion-year winning streak. Temperature has never lost a game. Temperature doesn't know it's playing. Temperature is not, in any meaningful sense, an entity that can be waited out."
Focus group data obtained by the Standard reveals why "waiting game" tested well as corporate messaging. "It implies patience as virtue, positions the resort as strategic actor rather than victim, and most importantly, suggests games have endings—hopefully favorable ones," read an internal memo. "Under no circumstances use 'extinction,' 'permanent,' or 'new normal.'"
For his part, Price—still processing the existence of rocks—remained optimistic. "I'm sure the snow will come back," he told reporters. "It always does. I mean, I assume it does. I've never actually thought about where snow comes from. Is that something I should know?"
He paused. "Wait. Is snow made of something?"
At press time, geological counselors were being dispatched to the mountain.
Reader Correspondence
The HuckFinn Standard welcomes letters from readers. The following represent a selection of responses to this article.
I want to be very clear that when I said "product" I meant snow. Just snow. Normal snow that we make. With machines. That we market. As a product. Because it IS a product now, technically, since we manufacture it. But I didn't mean it like THAT. We're not a drug operation. We're a snow operation. Which I realize sounds worse the more I say it. I'm going to stop talking now.
Bro you're literally Walter White but for skiing. You're running a snow operation out of a mountain, stepping on pure powder to maintain margins. I respect the hustle but maybe workshop the terminology.
Look, I don't think this article is being fair to me. I KNEW mountains had stuff inside them. I just never SAW it before. There's a difference. When you go skiing, you're looking at the snow, not the mountain. That's the whole point. Am I supposed to be thinking about rocks while I'm skiing? Who does that? Show me one person who goes skiing and thinks "wow I wonder what geological formations lie beneath this snowpack." NO ONE.
Jackson. Buddy. I have dedicated my entire life to rocks. I think about rocks constantly. I was BORN thinking about what's under the snow. But more to the point: you called it a "pasture." A PASTURE. That's where cows eat grass. You were on an ALPINE SLOPE. These are different biomes. Different elevations. Different EVERYTHING. I genuinely don't know what to do with this information. I'm going to need to take a walk. Over some rocks. Which I will notice.
Is a pasture not just a flat part of a mountain? I genuinely don't know anymore. Is there like a chart?
The Ouroboros Engine diagram in this article should be in every business school textbook. This is the purest distillation of capitalism's relationship with nature I've ever seen. Create the problem → Sell the solution → Solution worsens problem → Sell more solution → Repeat until heat death. It's honestly beautiful in a watching-the-Titanic-sink kind of way.
lol "waiting game"
I worked snowmaking at Boreal for three seasons. We always called it "product" internally. I thought it was just industry slang but now I'm realizing it might have been a collective psychological defense mechanism. Like if we called it "snow" we'd have to confront that we were making fake snow to replace real snow that wasn't falling because of things we were doing to make fake snow. "Product" lets you not think about it. It's just... product. You produce it. End of story. I need therapy.
Several readers have written to complain that this article is "mean" to Jackson Price. Having reviewed the correspondence, I can confirm that: (1) Mr. Price did voluntarily state that he had never seen dirt or rocks in seven years of visiting a mountain, and (2) he did call an alpine ski slope a "pasture." The Standard stands by its reporting. If Mr. Price would like to submit a letter clarifying his understanding of landforms, we would be happy to publish it in our weekly Corrections & Geological Clarifications section.
The funniest part of this article is the phrase "waiting game with temperatures." As if temperature is an opponent. As if temperature knows you're waiting. As if temperature could, at any moment, think "you know what, I've made my point" and go back down. Temperature is not a negotiating partner. Temperature is the emergent statistical behavior of molecular kinetic energy across a planetary atmosphere. You cannot wait it out. It is not aware of time. It is entropy itself. But sure. Waiting game. Let's call it that.