BREAKING: Local Woman Finishes Book Without Posting About It; Authorities Baffled
Literacy Crisis / Eco-Censorship / Brain Wellness
Reading Declared "Suspiciously Private Activity" By Same People Who Share Location Data With 47 Apps
"Books Don't Even Have A Terms Of Service," Warns Concerned Parent
By MARTHA WAVELENGTH | HuckFinn Staff Writer
Published: January 2, 2026 | 4 min read
CAUGHT IN THE ACT: Local woman engages in "unlicensed display of depth" while neighbors document the incident for community safety. Amazon surveillance drone confirms reading activity at "concerning levels." Moths (pictured: top right, on break) await deployment orders.
Photo: HuckFinn Visual Journalism Unit / Getty Images / That One Ring Doorbell
EVERYWHERE, U.S.A. — In what privacy experts are calling "the most predictable development since influencers discovered therapy-speak," reading has officially been declared a "suspiciously private activity" by the same demographic that voluntarily shares location data with 47 apps, photographs of their children, and detailed records of their breakfast preferences with the entire internet.
The controversy began when Amazon notified a local woman that she had read "8 Kindle books since September"—what company representatives described as "a celebration of customer engagement" and what behavioral analysts immediately flagged as "a soft biometric scan of a household's remaining attention span."
"I have also read at least 10 physical books," the woman responded, in what experts later classified as "an unlicensed display of depth" and "a suspiciously high-volume relationship with paper."
Her mother's response—"Common sense"—has since been analyzed by seventeen think tanks, none of whom could agree on what the phrase means but all of whom have secured funding to study it further.
Advertisement
SMOOTHIFY Brain Cream Reduce Unsightly Cognitive Wrinkles in Just 30 Days!
"I used to have opinions. Now I just have vibes." — Satisfied Customer
THINK LESS TODAY
The Smooth Brain Initiative
Within hours of the incident going viral—through forces "nobody could technically prove weren't magical"—marketing firms and public health-adjacent nonprofits began pitching what insiders call a "destigmatize-everything-except-thinking" rollout.
Draft slogans seen in early campaign materials include:
SMOOTH IS BEAUTIFUL
WRINKLES ARE FOR LAUNDRY, NOT THINKING
KEEP YOUR THOUGHTS STREAMLINED FOR FASTER FEED INTEGRATION
BE THE PERSON AN ALGORITHM CAN LOVE WITHOUT TRYING
One concept deck proposes a new BMI-style metric—Brain Mass Index—to help citizens track "surface area creep" before it becomes socially visible. Another recommends equating brain ripples to obesity, a comparison reviewers praised as "scientifically incorrect in a way that will feel emotionally accurate to the right demographic."
"It's going to make total sense to people whose criteria for something making sense solely depends on who told them it should."
CALCULATE YOUR BRAIN SMOOTHNESS SCORE
Answer honestly. Your algorithm is watching.
Q1: How many books have you read this year?
Books? I read captions
1-3 (socially acceptable)
4-10 (concerning)
10+ (seek help)
Q2: When you see a long article, you:
Skip to comments for the real truth
Read headline, form strong opinion
Skim first paragraph, give up
Read the whole thing
Q3: Your thoughts are best described as:
Pre-approved by my social group
Mostly vibes
Occasionally original
Complex and nuanced
DANGEROUSLY WRINKLEDACCEPTABLEPERFECTLY SMOOTH
Fahrenheit 454, But Eco-Friendly
The campaign arrives amid alarming reports that reading is down 40%—a trend analysts say makes society "dramatically easier to manage."
"They don't need to burn books like in Fahrenheit 454," said one cultural strategist, referencing the classic novel in which firefighters bravely protect literature by incinerating it and then posting a reaction video. "They can just give everyone TikTok, and moths and bookworms will do the job, which is far more ecologically friendly."
Environmental groups praised the "closed-loop literacy disposal system," noting that outsourcing book destruction to insects dramatically reduces carbon emissions compared to traditional authoritarian bonfires, while also creating meaningful employment for moths who previously faced stigma for "eating knowledge."
LIVE: MOTH EMPLOYMENT DASHBOARD
🦋 working hard or hardly working? 🦋
2,847
Books Processed Today
14.2M
Moths Employed
0.00
Carbon Emissions (tons)
National Literacy Reduction Progress
73% toward "Dramatically Easier To Manage" threshold
"Finally, representation for moths!" — Moth Anti-Defamation League
Sponsored Content
OUTSOURCE YOUR REALITY Why verify anything yourself when an app can do it for you?
Now featuring: Directions / Dinner / Opinions / The Will To Read
TRUST US
"I Cannot Prove An iPhone Isn't Magic"
Complicating the national response is the growing realization that nobody can actually explain anything anymore—particularly not without sounding like a wizard begging to be audited.
"For example, I cannot prove an iPhone isn't magic," said one citizen, speaking from the exhausted middle class of modern epistemology, where your options are either "trust specialists" or "become one by Tuesday."
He went on to explain that in an age of massive specialized knowledge, society increasingly defaults to an appeal-to-authority pipeline that starts with "surely there's no conspiracy about how iPhones work" and ends with "just fudge that into politics," at which point people begin trusting whatever sounds most like confidence.
"It's part of how everything got out of control," he said, describing a culture in which citizens outsource reality verification the way they outsource directions, dinner, and the will to read anything longer than a caption.
"Books don't even have a Terms of Service. How do we know what they're agreeing to?"
— Concerned Parent
Amazon Denies Everything, Announces Everything
Amazon representatives insisted the reading report was intended as "a celebration of customer engagement" and not, as critics claim, "a soft biometric scan of a household's remaining attention span."
Still, internal sources confirmed that future versions of the report may include additional features, such as:
A "Smoothness Score" indicating how likely your opinions are to be pre-approved by your social group
A "Ripple Alert" that triggers when you finish a book containing subordinate clauses
A "Common Sense" button that automatically replies to complex statements without reading them
At press time, the woman's mother was reportedly seen continuing her day normally, while the rest of the nation argued online about whether reading is a virtue, a threat, or simply a hobby best kept private—like journaling, independent thought, and any emotion that cannot be monetized.
Contributing: The Associated Press, Reuters, That One Guy On Twitter Who Seems Confident, Your Mom
SUBSCRIBE TO HUCKFINN DAILY
Get tomorrow's concerns delivered to your inbox today. We promise not to track you any more than everyone else does.
TODAY'S POLL: Is reading a suspiciously private activity?
Yes, if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to read
No, but I'm keeping my books off the grid just in case
I don't read, I just wait for the movie (which I then read the synopsis of)
Common sense
A Message From Our Sponsors
FAHRENHEIT 454 ECO-MATCHES "For When You Need To Burn Books But Care About The Planet"
Made from 100% recycled banned literature. Carbon neutral. Irony heavy.
SHOP SUSTAINABLE CENSORSHIP
COMMENTS2,847 Comments
F
FirstCommenter1997TOP FAN
2 minutes ago
FIRST!!!!!!
1.2K847Reply
A
ActuallySecond1 minute ago
nobody cares
2.1K12Reply
T
TrustIssues_Karen5 minutes ago
This is why I have trust issues. Also this is why I stopped reading in 2019. Also this is why I only get my news from TikTok astrologers.
84723Reply
M
WineMomWarriorVERIFIED MOM
8 minutes ago
As a MOM, I can tell you that books are DANGEROUS. My son read Harry Potter and now he thinks he can do magic. He also thinks vaccines cause 5G. We don't talk about where he learned that.
3.4K1.8KReply
W
WellActually_PhD12 minutes ago
Well, ACTUALLY, Fahrenheit 451 (not 454) was written by Ray Bradbury in 1953 and was about censorship and— *gets pushed into locker*
2345.6KReply
?
ThatsTheJoke11 minutes ago
r/whoooosh
8.7KReply
R
ResearchWarrior1776CONTROVERSIAL
15 minutes ago
I did my own research (watched a 45-minute YouTube video at 2x speed) and moths are actually CIA drones. The "books" they're "eating" are actually quantum servers storing your DNA. WAKE UP SHEEPLE.
12K11KReply
P
JustHereForTheComments18 minutes ago
didn't read the article, just here for the comments
47K3Reply
M
MainCharacterEnergy22 minutes ago
nobody asked + ratio + you fell off + smooth brain + L + touch grass + no books
6.9K420Reply
B
TotallyRealHuman_47SUSPECTED BOT
25 minutes ago
Hello fellow humans! I too enjoy the consuming of printed word materials and the developing of brain surface area. This article has made me experience human emotions such as "concern" and "the wanting to click on advertisements." Please visit our sponsor bit.ly/totallylegit
238.9KReply
O
BackInMyDay195231 minutes ago
Back in MY day we read books AND walked uphill both ways to the library AND the moths were GRATEFUL for the work. Now everyone wants "TikTok" and "rights." Kids these days don't know how good they have it with their smooth brains.
892234Reply
?
ThisButUnironically34 minutes ago
wait is this satire or
15K2KReply
?
PoesLaw33 minutes ago
yes
22KReply
M
TheMotherInQuestionVERIFIED
37 minutes ago
Common sense.
147K0Reply
C
CanWeTalkAbout42 minutes ago
Can we talk about how this article is literally me?? I felt so SEEN. Also can we talk about how problematic reading is? Also can we talk about how I haven't read a book since 2014 and I'm thriving?
5.4K1.2KReply
M
OfficialMothUnionVERIFIED MOTH
45 minutes ago
On behalf of Local 451, we appreciate the positive coverage. However, we must clarify: we prefer "Knowledge Recycling Specialists." Also we demand hazard pay for having to eat Ayn Rand.
89K12Reply
W
SirThisIsAWendys48 minutes ago
sir this is a wendy's
34K567Reply
P
PatriotEagle177652 minutes ago
This is exactly what [POLITICAL PARTY] wants!!! They want us all to have smooth brains so we vote for [OPPOSING PARTY]!! I knew this ever since [CONSPIRACY THEORY] and [UNRELATED TANGENT] and furthermore [CAPSLOCK RANT THAT GOES ON FOR 847 WORDS AND SOMEHOW INVOLVES THE MOON LANDING]
[Comment truncated - 12 more paragraphs]
2.3K2.3KReply
X
Unsubscribing_Final55 minutes ago
This is the LAST STRAW. I am UNSUBSCRIBING and NEVER coming back. See you all tomorrow.
12K234Reply
Warning: Loading more comments may cause brain ripples
Related Articles
Technology
Apple Introduces "iThink" — Outsources Your Opinions Directly To The Cloud
Health
CDC Recommends Limiting Brain Wrinkles To "No More Than You Can Hide Under A Hat"
Business
Amazon Prime Now Delivers Pre-Formed Opinions In Under 2 Hours
Science
Study Finds Thinking Is Down 60%, Making Everyone "Much More Agreeable At Parties"
You Might Also Be Interested In
🧠➡️🥚
QUIZ: How Smooth Is YOUR Brain? (Sponsored by Smoothify)
📱😍
10 Apps That Know You Better Than You Know Yourself (Literally)
🦋💼
CAREERS: Now Hiring! Join The Moth Economy
📚🔥
Fahrenheit 454: The Eco-Friendly Reboot Nobody Asked For
🎯✨
Be The Person An Algorithm Can Love — A Self-Help Journey
👵💭
"Common Sense": What Does It Mean? 17 Think Tanks Investigate
Targeted Just For You
FEELING ATTACKED BY THIS ARTICLE? That's called "recognition." It's a symptom of having read something.
Consult your local TikTok feed immediately to restore smoothness.
[Comment truncated - 12 more paragraphs]
Warning: Loading more comments may cause brain ripples